aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNao Pross <np@0hm.ch>2021-12-22 04:13:39 +0100
committerNao Pross <np@0hm.ch>2021-12-22 04:13:39 +0100
commitc43ab707f30f3b0e8582b403a84b7228f14bc2f6 (patch)
tree8a241ca2869e0c229c24ed07de85be2c9b3b32ca
parentCorrections (diff)
downloadFading-c43ab707f30f3b0e8582b403a84b7228f14bc2f6.tar.gz
Fading-c43ab707f30f3b0e8582b403a84b7228f14bc2f6.zip
TODO why alpha is 0.35
-rw-r--r--doc/thesis/chapters/implementation.tex4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/thesis/chapters/implementation.tex b/doc/thesis/chapters/implementation.tex
index b418927..24cbc12 100644
--- a/doc/thesis/chapters/implementation.tex
+++ b/doc/thesis/chapters/implementation.tex
@@ -92,7 +92,9 @@ To compute the empirical bit error rate (BER) of the setup, the data has to be f
GR provides a constellation modulator block, that already implements several standard constellations (QPSK and 16-ary QAM being of interest for us). The block also already integrates a root raised cosine filter, whose phase bandwidth (roll-off factor) can be given as parameter; in all flow graphs the roll off factor is \(\alpha = 0.35\).
-%TODO: Warum alpha 0.35
+% TODO: Warum alpha 0.35
+%
+% Because we had no restrictions on bandwidth (except for the physical ones, which are unreachable). Though, we are in the 2.4 GHz spectrum which is pretty crowded. For a sanity check: we are using a very short symbol time of around T = 1 / 1 MHz = 1 us, then the bandwidth with \alpha = 0.35 is B = (1 + \alpha) / (2 * T) = 675 kHz. Pretty small, when compared for ex to WiFi 802.11g channels that are like 20 MHz wide.
\section{Receiver chain}