aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/buch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'buch')
-rw-r--r--buch/papers/kugel/spherical-harmonics.tex203
1 files changed, 194 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/buch/papers/kugel/spherical-harmonics.tex b/buch/papers/kugel/spherical-harmonics.tex
index 2ded50b..2a00754 100644
--- a/buch/papers/kugel/spherical-harmonics.tex
+++ b/buch/papers/kugel/spherical-harmonics.tex
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ write the solutions
The restriction that the separation constant $m$ needs to be an integer arises
from the fact that we require a $2\pi$-periodicity in $\varphi$ since the
coordinate systems requires that $\Phi(\varphi + 2\pi) = \Phi(\varphi)$.
-Unfortunately, solving \eqref{kugel:eqn:ode-theta} is as straightforward,
+Unfortunately, solving \eqref{kugel:eqn:ode-theta} is not as straightforward,
actually, it is quite difficult, and the process is so involved that it will
require a dedicated section of its own.
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ case of the former that is known known as the \emph{Legendre polynomials}, since
we only need a solution between $-1$ and $1$.
\begin{lemma}[Legendre polynomials]
- \label{kugel:lem:legendre-poly}
+ \label{kugel:thm:legendre-poly}
The polynomial function
\[
P_n(z) = \sum^{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}_{k=0}
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ Legendre equation, we can make use of the following lemma patch the solutions
such that they also become solutions of the associated Legendre equation
\eqref{kugel:eqn:associated-legendre}.
-\begin{lemma} \label{kugel:lem:extend-legendre}
+\begin{lemma} \label{kugel:thm:extend-legendre}
If $Z_n(z)$ is a solution of the Legendre equation \eqref{kugel:eqn:legendre},
then
\begin{equation*}
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ such that they also become solutions of the associated Legendre equation
See section \ref{kugel:sec:proofs:legendre}.
\end{proof}
-What is happening in lemma \ref{kugel:lem:extend-legendre}, is that we are
+What is happening in lemma \ref{kugel:thm:extend-legendre}, is that we are
essentially inserting a square root function in the solution in order to be able
to reach the parts of the domain near the poles at $\pm 1$ of the associated
Legendre equation, which is not possible only using power series
@@ -356,9 +356,10 @@ $Y^m_n(\vartheta, \varphi)$.
\label{kugel:def:spherical-harmonics}
The functions
\begin{equation*}
- Y_{m,n}(\vartheta, \varphi) = P^m_n(\cos \vartheta) e^{im\varphi},
+ Y^m_n (\vartheta, \varphi) = P^m_n(\cos \vartheta) e^{im\varphi},
\end{equation*}
- where $m, n \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $|m| < n$ are called spherical harmonics.
+ where $m, n \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $|m| < n$ are called (unnormalized) spherical
+ harmonics.
\end{definition}
\begin{figure}
@@ -366,9 +367,195 @@ $Y^m_n(\vartheta, \varphi)$.
\kugelplaceholderfig{\textwidth}{.8\paperheight}
\caption{
\kugeltodo{Big picture with the first few spherical harmonics.}
+ \label{kugel:fig:spherical-harmonics}
}
\end{figure}
+\kugeltodo{Describe how they look like with fig.
+\ref{kugel:fig:spherical-harmonics}}
+
+\subsection{Orthogonality of $P_n$, $P^m_n$ and $Y^m_n$}
+
+We shall now discuss an important property of the spherical harmonics: they form
+an orthogonal system. And since the spherical harmonics contain the Ferrers or
+associated Legendre functions, we need to discuss their orthogonality first.
+But the Ferrers functions themselves depend on the Legendre polynomials, so that
+will be our starting point.
+
+\begin{lemma} For the Legendre polynomials $P_n(z)$ and $P_k(z)$ it holds that
+ \label{kugel:thm:legendre-poly-ortho}
+ \begin{equation*}
+ \int_{-1}^1 P_n(z) P_k(z) \, dz
+ = \frac{2}{2n + 1} \delta_{nk}
+ = \begin{cases}
+ \frac{2}{2n + 1} & \text{if } n = k, \\
+ 0 & \text{otherwise}.
+ \end{cases}
+ \end{equation*}
+\end{lemma}
+\begin{proof}
+ To start, consider the fact that that the Legendre equation
+ \eqref{kugel:eqn:legendre}, of which two distinct Legendre polynomials
+ $P_n(z)$ and $P_k(z)$ are a solution ($n \neq k$), can be rewritten in the
+ following form:
+ \begin{equation}
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[
+ \left( 1 - z^2 \right) \frac{dZ}{dz}
+ \right] + n(n+1) Z(z) = 0.
+ \end{equation}
+ So we rewrite the Legendre equations for $P_n(z)$ and $P_k(z)$:
+ \begin{align*}
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[
+ \left( 1 - z^2 \right) \frac{dP_n}{dz}
+ \right] + n(n+1) P_n(z) &= 0,
+ &
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[
+ \left( 1 - z^2 \right) \frac{dP_k}{dz}
+ \right] + k(k+1) P_k(z) &= 0,
+ \end{align*}
+ then we multiply the former by $P_k(z)$ and the latter by $P_n(z)$ and
+ subtract the two to get
+ \begin{equation*}
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[
+ \left( 1 - z^2 \right) \frac{dP_n}{dz}
+ \right] P_k(z) + n(n+1) P_n(z) P_k(z)
+ -
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[
+ \left( 1 - z^2 \right) \frac{dP_k}{dz}
+ \right] P_n(z) - k(k+1) P_k(z) P_n(z) = 0.
+ \end{equation*}
+ By grouping terms, making order and integrating with respect to $z$ from $-1$
+ to 1 we obtain
+ \begin{gather}
+ \int_{-1}^1 \left\{
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[
+ \left( 1 - z^2 \right) \frac{dP_n}{dz}
+ \right] P_k(z)
+ -
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[
+ \left( 1 - z^2 \right) \frac{dP_k}{dz}
+ \right] P_n(z) - k(k+1) P_k(z) P_n(z)
+ \right\} \,dz \nonumber \\
+ + \left[ n(n+1) - k(k+1) \right] \int_{-1}^1 P_k(z) P_n(z) \, dz = 0.
+ \label{kugel:thm:legendre-poly-ortho:proof:1}
+ \end{gather}
+ Since by the product rule
+ \begin{equation*}
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[ (1 - z^2) \frac{dP_k}{dz} P_n(z) \right]
+ =
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[ (1 - z^2) \frac{dP_n}{dz} \right] P_k(z)
+ + (1 - z^2) \frac{dP_n}{dz} \frac{dP_k}{dz},
+ \end{equation*}
+ we can simplify the first term in
+ \eqref{kugel:thm:legendre-poly-ortho:proof:1} to get
+ \begin{gather*}
+ \int_{-1}^1 \left\{
+ \frac{d}{dz} \left[ (1 - z^2) \frac{dP_k}{dz} P_n(z) \right]
+ - \cancel{(1 - z^2) \frac{dP_n}{dz} \frac{dP_k}{dz}}
+ - \frac{d}{dz} \left[ (1 - z^2) \frac{dP_n}{dz} P_k(z) \right]
+ + \cancel{(1 - z^2) \frac{dP_k}{dz} \frac{dP_n}{dz}}
+ \right\} \, dz \\
+ = \int_{-1}^1 \frac{d}{dz} \left\{ (1 - z^2) \left[
+ \frac{dP_k}{dz} P_n(z) - \frac{dP_n}{dz} P_k(z)
+ \right] \right\} \, dz
+ = (1 - z^2) \left[
+ \frac{dP_k}{dz} P_n(z) - \frac{dP_n}{dz} P_k(z)
+ \right] \Bigg|_{-1}^1,
+ \end{gather*}
+ which always equals 0 because the product contains $1 - z^2$ and the bounds
+ are at $\pm 1$. Thus, of \eqref{kugel:thm:legendre-poly-ortho:proof:1} only
+ the second term remains and the equation becomes
+ \begin{equation*}
+ \left[ n(n+1) - k(k+1) \right] \int_{-1}^1 P_k(z) P_n(z) \, dz = 0.
+ \end{equation*}
+ By dividing by the constant in front of the integral we have our first result.
+ Now we need to show that when $n = k$ the integral equals $2 / (2n + 1)$.
+ % \begin{equation*}
+ % \end{equation*}
+ \kugeltodo{Finish proof. Can we do it without the generating function of
+ $P_n$?}
+\end{proof}
+
+In a similarly algebraically tedious fashion, we can also continue to check for
+orthogonality for the Ferrers functions $P^m_n(z)$, since they are related to
+$P_n(z)$ by a $m$-th derivative, and obtain the following result.
+
+\begin{lemma} For the associated Legendre functions
+ \label{kugel:thm:associated-legendre-ortho}
+ \begin{equation*}
+ \int_{-1}^1 P^m_n(z) P^{m'}_{n'}(z) \, dz
+ = \frac{2(m + n)!}{(2n + 1)(n - m)!} \delta_{nn'}
+ = \begin{cases}
+ \frac{2(m + n)!}{(2n + 1)(n - m)!} & \text{if } n = n', \\
+ 0 & \text{otherwise}.
+ \end{cases}
+ \end{equation*}
+\end{lemma}
+\begin{proof}
+ \kugeltodo{Is it worth showing? IMHO no, it is mostly the same as Lemma
+ \ref{kugel:thm:legendre-poly-ortho} with the difference that the $m$-th
+ derivative is a pain to deal with.}
+\end{proof}
+
+An interesting fact to observe in lemma
+\ref{kugel:thm:associated-legendre-ortho} is that the orthogonality is only
+affected in the lower index, while varying $m$ only changes the constant in
+front of the Kronecker delta. By having the orthogonality relations of the
+Legendre functions we can finally show that spherical harmonics are also
+orthogonal.
+
+\begin{lemma} For the spherical harmonics
+ \kugeltodo{Fix horizontal spacing, inner product definition is missing.}
+ \label{kugel:thm:spherical-harmonics-ortho}
+ \begin{equation*}
+ \langle Y^m_n, Y^{m'}_{n'} \rangle
+ = \int_{-\pi}^\pi \int_0^{2\pi}
+ Y^m_n(\vartheta, \varphi) \overline{Y^{m'}_{n'}(\vartheta, \varphi)}
+ \sin \vartheta \, d\varphi \, d\vartheta
+ = \frac{-4\pi}{2n + 1} \frac{(m + n)!}{(n - m)!} \delta_{nn'}
+ = \begin{cases}
+ \frac{-4\pi}{2n + 1} \frac{(m + n)!}{(n - m)!} & \text{if } n = n', \\
+ 0 & \text{otherwise}.
+ \end{cases}
+ \end{equation*}
+\end{lemma}
+\begin{proof}
+ We will begin by doing a bit of algebraic maipulaiton:
+ \begin{align*}
+ \int_{-\pi}^\pi \int_0^{2\pi}
+ Y^m_n(\vartheta, \varphi) \overline{Y^{m'}_{n'}(\vartheta, \varphi)}
+ \sin \vartheta \, d\varphi \, d\vartheta
+ &= \int_{-\pi}^\pi \int_0^{2\pi}
+ e^{im\varphi} P^m_n(\cos \vartheta)
+ e^{-im'\varphi} P^{m'}_{n'}(\cos \vartheta)
+ \, d\varphi \sin \vartheta \, d\vartheta
+ \\
+ &= \int_{-\pi}^\pi
+ P^m_n(\cos \vartheta) P^{m'}_{n'}(\cos \vartheta)
+ \int_0^{2\pi} e^{i(m - m')\varphi}
+ \, d\varphi \sin \vartheta \, d\vartheta
+ .
+ \end{align*}
+ First, notice that the associated Legendre polynomials are assumed to be real,
+ and are thus unaffected by the complex conjugation. Then, we can see that when
+ $m = m'$ the inner integral simplifies to $\int_0^{2\pi} 1 \, d\varphi$ which
+ equals $2\pi$, so in this case the expression becomes
+ \begin{equation*}
+ 2\pi \int_{-\pi}^\pi
+ P^m_n(\cos \vartheta) P^{m'}_{n'}(\cos \vartheta)
+ \sin \vartheta \, d\vartheta
+ = -2\pi \int_{-1}^1 P^m_n(z) P^{m'}_{n'}(z) \, dz
+ = \frac{-4\pi(m + n)!}{(2n + 1)(n - m)!} \delta_{nn'},
+ \end{equation*}
+ where in the second step we performed the substitution $z = \cos\vartheta$;
+ $d\vartheta = \frac{d\vartheta}{dz} dz= - dz / \sin \vartheta$, and then we
+ used lemma \ref{kugel:thm:associated-legendre-ortho}. Now we just need look at
+ the case when $m \neq m'$. Fortunately this is easy: the inner integral is
+ $\int_0^{2\pi} e^{i(m - m')\varphi} d\varphi$, or in other words we are
+ integrating a complex exponetial over the entire period, which always results
+ in zero. Thus, we do not need to do anything and the proof is complete.
+\end{proof}
+
\subsection{Normalization}
\kugeltodo{Discuss various normalizations.}
@@ -403,8 +590,6 @@ Ora, visto che la soluzione dell'eigenfunction problem รจ formata dalla moltipli
\section{Series Expansions in $C(S^2)$}
-\subsection{Orthogonality of $P_n$, $P^m_n$ and $Y^m_n$}
-
-\subsection{Series Expansion}
+\subsection{Spherical Harmonics Series}
\subsection{Fourier on $S^2$}